Civil war rights

The Battle of Naseby in June 1645 and the Battle of Langport in July 1645 marked the destruction of the armies of King Charles and the First Civil War drifted to a conclusion the following year when the Scots handed Charles over to Parliament,

In the period that followed, there was discussion of what sort of socirty the members of the Parliamentary army wanted.

Read the accounts of The Putney Debates now and they recall that the men who fought for Cromwell in battles like those at Naesby and Langport were men who had set out with high ideals.  The soldiers were evangelical Christians, they were men whose daily lives were shaped by Scripture and prayer.  They believed everyone should pursue their own conscience, that no government had a right to impose religion.

In An Agreement of the People issued on 28th October 1647, they declared:

That matters of religion and the ways of God’s worship are not at all entrusted by us to any human power, because therein we cannot remit or exceed a tittle of what our consciences dictate to be the mind of God, without wilful sin.

The Levellers, the soldiers who took part in the Putney Debates, had no place for an established church, no place for secular powers being used to dictate people’s religious beliefs or their practices.

The Levellers’ vision extended much further than matters of religious belief, there was a belief in universal suffrage, an idea that their opponents claimed could only lead to anarchy and an end to private property. On 29th October 1647, after a morning prayer meeting, the soldiers had resumed their debates. Colonel Thomas Rainsborough, who became a heroic figure for the Levellers, declared during the debate:

For really I think that the poorest hee that is in England hath a life to live, as the greatest hee; and therefore truly, Sr, I think itt clear, that every Man that is to live under a Government ought first by his own Consent to put himself under that Government; and I do think that the poorest man in England is not at all bound in a strict sense to that Government that he hath not had a voice to put Himself under.

The poorest man has as much a life to live as the richest man: a declaration of the dignity and rights of every person, rights that were about more than a matter of words or principles, rights that had direct political implications.

Neither Cromwell nor the Crown would entertain the introduction of such rights. The oppression of the Commonwealth would be followed by the oppression of the Restoration.

This entry was posted in This sceptred isle. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Civil war rights

  1. Sackerson says:

    Business not finished.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *