Living in a constant present

“Aunt Ella said Great Aunt Annie use to have trouble with her legs. She would suddenly fall.”

There seemed little purpose in trying to ask in which generation Great Aunt Annie had lived, my mother lives in an eternal present. Aunt Ella was a great aunt to me, two generations back, so was Annie my mother’s great aunt or Aunt Ella’s great aunt? Three generations back or four generations back, Great Aunt Annie was someone with mobility problems, as present now as she had been in the Nineteenth Century.

Finding a similar sense of being present in centuries of time is not easy, perhaps the iPhone calendar allows imagination of it. It is said that the iPhone can provide dates to AD 60,000 and beyond, though why anyone should need such a calendar is baffling.

Perhaps some of us are like the elves in The Lord of the Rings. Tolkien’s mythical heroes always seemed an attractive race of beings. The Elven king Thranduil had fought Sauron the Dark Lord some three thousand years prior to the events of The Fellowship of the Ring. Wouldn’t such longevity completely transform our lives? When the elves do depart from the present world, they don’t die, they sail to the grey havens. It seems a prospect infinitely more attractive than the brief moment of human life.

Yet, if life could be prolonged, what difference would it make?

If we could live hundreds of years, with a reasonable quality of life, would it make a great difference to the way we live now? Would the additional years be devoted to the achievement of things for which there is presently not enough time – studies for which there had not previously been time, reading all the books which we had promised ourselves, planting the perfect garden, learning skills we had never considered, doing all those things we missed out on?

Or would the extra time be used much as much of the present time? Upon the death of a mutual friend, a friend once pointed out the old adage, “it is not the years in your life, it’s the life in your years that matters.” At the time, it seemed a pointing out of the obvious, but the passing years have reinforced the truth of his comment.

Perhaps it’s possible to live 500 years, and still be only 50, and perhaps it’s possible to last until the age of 500 having lived only 50 years. If one reached 2521, how much would be done?

Posted in The stuff of daily life | Leave a comment

Missing the details

Photographic collections are always fascinating. There is no need to know anything about lenses or details of exposure, or the camera used, or the film on which the image was taken, they can just be pictures for their own sake.

Mrs Holman's Cottage

Looking through Edwin Smith’s Evocations of Place, a very generous present received more than a decade ago, there is an evocation not just of place, but of characters long dead.

Mrs Holman, owner of the cottage in which Edwin Smith took a photograph of the fireplace in 1936 is a lady whose place tells much about its owner.

Mrs Holman lived in the little Somerset town of Crewkerne, a town on the A30, the old trunk road from London to Land’s End. It would have been a bustling and prosperous place, for there was enough work for the foundry that made the fine range that sits in her hearth.

Mrs Holman is a lady with a sense of the value of things rather than the price of things. A pair of horsemen sit either side of her mantlepiece, the rider to the right is headless, but what matters is that such heirlooms are preserved and passed on. It would have been alien to people of Mrs Holman’s generation to have gone to someone and asked, “How much is it worth?” Value was something far greater than price.

Mrs Holman’s family are central to her life. Sitting at her fireside each evening, she would have looked at the framed photographs lined up amongst the china, who was living and who was dead? We don’t know. In the 1930s, before the development of antibiotics, many lives were very short.

Mrs Holman is traditional in her politics. This is safe Tory territory and her mirror reflects a picture of the king. He was probably the old king by the time the photograph was taken, the young Edward VIII having acceded, for King George died in January and there is no fire in the hearth to suggest that the picture was taken so early in the year.

Mrs Holman is fastidious about timekeeping, the clock that sits on the mantlepiece is a big brass alarm clock. it shows just after quarter past two. Mr Smith probably arrived at two o’clock to take his photographs and Mrs Holman would have been waiting for the knock at the door.

There is so much evoked in a single photograph, a photograph which the Royal Institute of British Architects prosaically catalogues online under “Fireplaces.” Clearly, they had missed the details of Mrs Holman.

Posted in Unreliable memories | 5 Comments

Thirty years later

10th March, the first anniversary of the death of my father, it is also the thirtieth anniversary of the death of my maternal grandfather, who died on 10th March 1991. Thirty years on and his soft words and gentle smile remain clear in the memory, together with his capacity for work and his enjoyment of silence

He was a farmer behind his times. He farmed in the Somerset parish in which the family had lived for generations He was a man not given to change, happy in doing things in the way he had always done them.

In the days before having to  go to school, I remember sitting on the back of the old carthorse, Dinah, as she pulled the hoe up and down between the rows of mangold wurzels.

Harvest time was no more modern. The binder, pulled by a grey Massey Ferguson tractor, would go slowly up and down through fields of wheat. The sheaves would be put into stooks until they were gathered on a trailer and taken back to the barn. It always fascinated me how he could bind sheaves together with twists of straw when the binder twine broke – it never worked when I tried.

He was a master of recycling before the word was invented. Everything was stored away, every piece of twine, every nut, screw and bolt, every box, every sack, nothing was wasted; nothing was disposed of without thought. His neighbouring farmers were as frugal in their ways; every bit of machinery was fixed and re-fixed and coaxed along years after its reasonable life expectancy. There was no money to pay for new things and no-one would have contemplated going into debt, if it couldn’t be paid for today, it couldn’t be paid for tomorrow.

The farming life was hard and unrelenting, I remember him with an old coat on, tied with string around the middle, with a hurricane lamp in one hand, and a pitchfork holding a bale of hay held over his shoulder with the other hand, heading out into the rain and mud on a Christmas Day evening when the rest of the country was sitting down to watch Morecambe and Wise. 

Not once did I ever hear him complain, it was a life lived in a community where hardships were shared and where there was a common understanding of what daily life was about.

His capacity for work was matched by an ability to be quiet. It is not hard to establish some tangible link with the past through which he lived. Sit at the farmhouse kitchen table and drink tea from cups and saucers, and, for one moment the years will slip away and he will be back in his usual seat at the kitchen table staring out.

He would always sit on after his evening meal. Perhaps he was dog tired after a day on the farm, perhaps he just liked to sit and ponder the world over the top of the china teacup in which my grandmother would always serve tea.  He would stare fixedly out through the window to the garden and the orchard beyond.  Passing the window would barely stir him from his reveries; his contemplations seemed deep and detached.

Such moments seemed odd in those years, why would you want to sit and stare out the window?  Why would you not want to go outside, or even drive somewhere else to talk with people?

There have been many moments since when it seemed possible to understand how much he valued his quietness; perhaps it was a retreat from other people, perhaps it was a retreat from the ugly things of the world? Perhaps it was a sense of timelessness.

When he died in 1991, he was buried a sheaf of wheat was placed on his coffin – a sign of his lifelong work as a farmer; a sign that he had been gathered in like wheat at the end of the summer; a sign that just as the wheat sown in the ground springs up in new life, so one might believe that those who are buried will rise again from the dead.

Posted in The stuff of daily life | 2 Comments

Lost moons

Waning crescent? Is that the right term? It was only last week that I discovered the meaning of “gibbous.” Perhaps I should have paid more attention to the copy of Old Moore’s Almanack bought by my grandmother every year. I would have known more about the names of the phases of the moon. Whatever the correct term, only a slim crescent of the moon remained in the morning sky above Gloucestershire this morning.

A line from the distant past surfaced, “Till moons shall wax and wane no more.” From a hymn learned in primary school, the words were immediately memorable:

Jesus shall reign where’er the sun
doth its successive journeys run,
his kingdom stretch from shore to shore,
till moons shall wax and wane no more.

Perhaps they were not the best of literature, but the lines possessed imagery with the power to capture the attention of a boy wholly indifferent to the church. No-one we knew went to church, no-one was religious, but the hymns and the Scripture lessons in our classroom linger in the memory more than five decades later.

Perhaps the lines linger because the drew upon the images with which we were familiar.  Shore to shore, of course, for us, meant from the Bristol Channel on the north Somerset coast to the English Channel on the Dorset coast. Phases of the moon were important to farming life, checking livestock, working until late hours, were easier with a full moon in a clear sky.

Perhaps the lines remain because religious language was different. It was old fashioned, it was thoroughly other than the Somerset dialect we spoke, a dialect filled with elisions and bad grammar. Religious language was about things we did not understand, about things that could not be explained by even our wise teachers.

In reducing religious language to the everyday, to the simple, to the banal, those in the church who sought to promote a dumbed-down Christianity lost the attention of children who, if nothing else, would have remembered what they had been taught at school.

Now, none of those who sit in the Year 7 classrooms seem able to recall the religion taught to them in primary school, even those who have been at Church of England schools. Perhaps they recall the Lord’s Prayer, perhaps they can tell the odd story from the life of Jesus, but moons that wax and wane are a thing of the long past and with their loss the church has lost the capacity to appeal to the imagination.

 

 

Posted in This sceptred isle | Leave a comment

Will the people turn against Harry?

It would be difficult to imagine a family more conservative than my own. Generation upon generation of small farmers in a small rural parish, they were not people given to radicalism. Farming life allowed little leisure, the sheer physical effort demanded by the daily work meant people slept well, too tired for the business of politics.

It was odd, then, when a local man told me that his family and my own had been on opposing sides in the Civil War. It seems his family had supported the Crown, whilst our family were Commonwealth people. Cavaliers versus Roundheads: ours had not seemed the sort of family who would have opposed the king, but which family did?

An uncle confirmed the tradition of the two families having stood on opposite sides at the Battle of Langport in 1645, “but we would have been the sort of people who carried the pikes,” he added.

Pike carriers or not, they had been there when seventeen thousand men had gathered on damp, marshy Somerset farmland to fight a battle, which, following on from the Battle of Naseby, destroyed the Royalist army.  Cromwell referred to the victory as the “Long Sutton mercy.”

It is hard to know what might have passed through the minds of those forebears as they stood at Wagg rhyne, facing the forces of the Crown. There must have been a deep sense of anger at the King for these quiet farming people to take up arms against him. Perhaps they were early antecedents of Chesterton’s people of England who had not spoken yet.

What seems reasonable to assume was that they had become angry not necessarily with the idea of the Crown, but with the high-handed and arrogant Charles Stuart who had come to represent it. If this was what monarchy meant, then they wanted nothing of it. They perhaps opposed the Crown not because they were radical, but because they were conservative. They had expectations of the institution which it was failing to fulfil.

Since Charles Stuart’s son became king when the monarchy was restored in 1660 there has been a tacit agreement between Crown and people that the people would show the Crown appropriate respect if the Crown behaved with appropriate dignity. When such dignity was not evident, the people would make their displeasure clear, as happened with the death of Diana in 1997.

The behaviour of Harry in these past days is the antithesis of the extraordinary dignity of his grandmother. Traditional, conservative people who have expectations shaped by centuries of history are unlikely to be impressed.

 

 

 

 

Posted in This sceptred isle | Leave a comment