Paul Selby, Hamlet, and Sebastian Faulks

It was late-September 1977 and our English A-Level class were an unprepossessing group of Sixth Form College students. Standing at the front of the room, Paul Selby, our tutor, must have felt it was going to be a challenging two years.

Being contrarian by nature, I remember thinking that the subject was one to be endured and lacked the substance or relevance of my other two A-level subjects, history and economics. Inclined to the hard Left in politics, I regarded the study of English Literature as bourgeois self-indulgence.

Paul Selby taught with passion and no more so than when he was teaching Shakespeare. Hamlet was our text for that autumn term and the teaching sought to engage us with the characters of Shakespeare’s tragedy.

‘Who cares about what was going on in Hamlet’s mind?’ I thought. I couldn’t understand why Paul Selby attempted to explore the psyche of someone who had never existed, what was the point?

I wasn’t interested in the affairs of the court at Elsinore. Were there a character with whom I identified, it was Fortinbras, the violent and hostile Norwegian monarch who sweeps away the renaissance values of the Danish court. Fortinbras was a man of action, Fortinbras would have made a revolutionary.

Paul Selby must have been annoyed at times with the lines of questioning I would pursue. Hamlet, for me, was a dithering narcissist.

Of course, I missed the point. I was trapped in a two-dimensional world more akin to the comic strips of the boys’ own comics than to any perspective that might have recognized the profound understanding of human nature that is expressed by Shakespeare in the play.

Perhaps Hamlet was annoying because it challenged those sat around the room to think about themselves. Perhaps it was annoying because it caused me to think.

Long after much else has been forgotten, those lessons linger in the memory. The gentle patience of Paul Selby with an obstreperous seventeen year old and the probing of the mind prompted by the lines of the play.

In a few lines in Snow Country, Sebastian Faulks identifies both the source of the discomfort caused by Hamlet and the reason for its endurance in the memory decades later.

‘And Shakespeare?’

‘He’s a case part isn’t he? My father had a theory that by having characters explain their thoughts and desires he made people aware for the first time in history that they all had minds of their own. Before that, they appeared to one another as two-dimensional. That woman was often angry. That man was often sad. He kept sheep, she made shoes. They gave each other names to signify these things.’

‘Are you saying he invented human nature?’

‘It’s what my father thought.’

‘So every play-goer standing in the mud thought himself a Hamlet?’

‘Once you’re awake to the possibility, it’s hard to forget. It’s a thought you can’t un-think. Like the moment the first man or woman achieved self-awareness. There was no going back, no return to what our ancestors might have been.’

Paul Selby didn’t just teach us English Literature, he introduced us to thoughts that could never be un-thought.

Posted in Unreliable memories | 7 Comments

A teacher who feels like Owl

I have the First Years after lunch tomorrow. Their capacity for tangential thinking seems to become magnified when lessons are in the afternoon. Yet they haven’t yet developed the skills for diversion possessed by the Year 8 students in the school in Weston-Super-Mare where I did my teacher training.

Talking about a religious artefact, I commented, ‘It’s not something that you would buy at Sainsbury’s.’ (Why had I mentioned Sainsbury’s? Because there was a huge branch directly across the road from the school).

The comment had been a mistake.

‘Sainsbury’s is very expensive, sir.’

‘Is it? Well, I was just using it as an example of a supermarket.’

My qualification of my comment had come too late. There ensued some seconds of debate worthy of a noisy House of Commons. Lidl and Aldi and Morrisons were mentioned as places that were cheaper. Tesco had its adherents. One girl declared, ‘we shop at Waitrose.’

The conversation had been both annoying and impressive, at that age I would have had little idea of the difference in prices between retailers.

I had been trying to teach a lesson on Sikhism.

‘Three, two and one – and quiet. Thank you, Year 8. We’re not talking about supermarkets, we’re talking about what Sikhs wear.’

There had been a look of disappointment on some of the faces, the robust discussion of supermarkets could clearly have continued for some time. I resumed the lesson but wished I had had a copy of Winnie the Pooh stories  to hand. We clearly wanted to talk about different things.

Owl and Pooh had wished to talk about different things the day that Christopher Robin led them on an ”expotition” to the North Pole.

“They had come to a stream which twisted and tumbled between high rocky banks, and Christopher Robin saw at once how dangerous it was.

“It’s just the place,” he explained, “for an Ambush.”

“What sort of bush?” whispered Pooh to Piglet. “A gorse-bush?”

“My dear Pooh,” said Owl in his superior way, “don’t you know what an Ambush is?”

“Owl,” said Piglet, looking round at him severely, “Pooh’s whisper was a perfectly private whisper, and there was no need – ”

“An Ambush,” said Owl, “is a sort of Surprise.”

“So is a gorse-bush sometimes,” said Pooh.

“An Ambush, as I was about to explain to Pooh,” said Piglet, “is a sort of Surprise.”

“If people jump out at you suddenly, that’s an Ambush,” said Owl.

“It’s an Ambush, Pooh, when people jump at you suddenly,” explained Piglet.

Pooh, who now knew what an Ambush was, said that a gorse-bush had sprung at him suddenly one day when he fell off a tree, and he had taken six days to get all the prickles out of himself.

“We are not talking about gorse-bushes,” said Owl a little crossly.

“I am,” said Pooh.

I wasn’t talking about supermarkets, they would have liked to have done so.

Posted in The stuff of daily life | Leave a comment

Saying ‘goodbye’ to Christmas

Walking up a city street on the evening of 6th January, there had been a large white elk peering down from the top of a wall that ran beside the street.  Perhaps it was intended to be a reindeer; it was white plastic and illuminated, a decoration marking the season.

In the Somerset of my childhood, it would have been thought bad luck not to have had the  Christmas trimmings down by Twelfth Night.  We would have recalled at the idea of keeping the full season of the Nativity and leaving the crib in place until 2nd February, the day when the church remembers Mary and Joseph taking Jesus to the Temple in Jerusalem when he was forty days old. We used to think that it was risky that a boy whose birthday fell on 8th January was allowed to keep up the Christmas tree in his house until his birthday party was over.

What is odd in 2023, in a post-Christian society, is that there is still a residual inclination to keep a Christmas holiday that concludes with the Feast of the Epiphany on 6th January, the day when the Wise Men from the East are remembered (or unwise, if you actually read of their crass stupidity in going to the thug Herod and telling him of their mission). 

Being honest, an elk, or a moose, or a reindeer, or whatever the white plastic figure was intended to represent, is probably more symbolic of the season celebrated by most people.  The past two weeks, for most people, will not have been filled with thoughts of shepherds and magi, instead they will have been a midwinter festival.

Apart from the aesthetic qualities of snowy landscapes, perhaps images from places of snow and ice are symbols of the hope that winter can be conquered, if creatures can survive in the worst of climes, then humans, with their ingenuity, will have no problem in enduring the worst that a cold season can bring.

Perhaps the time has come for a name for the season that is more representative of what it is that people actually believe, babies in mangers are not the stuff of most seasonal conversation.

Detaching the word ‘Christmas’ from activities and experiences that are at direct variance with the story that is told does not mean one is abandoning the traditional Christmas, rather one is trying to recover a sense of the Bible story, free from men with white beards dressed in big red coats, and free from the extraordinary excesses of the past two weeks.

Posted in The stuff of daily life | Leave a comment

Safe from gas

Apparently, Uncle Pat had begun his working life with the local gasworks and had then gained a job as a fitter with the Gas Board, converting homes to natural gas. It was a project that seemed to take a long time, for he moved to live in Ashburton in south Devon for some years to work in the conversion of homes there.

Uncle Pat’s work seemed always to be a ‘good thing’, the word ‘conversion’ suggested that there was a mission being undertaken.

The home farm was lit by gas in the 1940s. My mother recalls a moment from the early years of the Second World War. A younger sister had climbed over the side of the cot in which she had been placed to sleep and had fallen. Mercifully, the fall was onto an adjacent bed and she was unhurt, but the fall had shaken the house so much that the light from the delicate gas mantles had been extinguished and my grandmother had thought that a bomb had fallen nearby.

Restoring the light to the house had been a simple matter of relighting the mantles, but the people who lived in our community were pleased when electric lights were fitted in every house. It was more than about convenience. There was always a sense of fear about gas, a sense that something that brought life could also bring danger – and even death

The danger of gas produced in our local town, at the gasworks in Langport where Uncle Pat had begun his careeer, was well-known to anyone who lived in our area. There had been a mother and son living in a house on the village green in Long Sutton who had died following a gas leak. The most troubling thing about the incident had been that the family did not even have a gas supply to their house. The leak had been from a pipe that had passed by in the street outside.

To a boy who found the stories of gas leaks worrying, it seemed that the best option of all was to be in a house which had no gas supply of any sort. It certainly seemed best to live in a house which was near no gas main. When we moved to High Ham in 1967, a village three miles from the nearest gas main, there was a sense of relief. Uncle Pat would not have to come to protect us.

Posted in Unreliable memories | Leave a comment

Going to Broodseinde

Christmas is past and thoughts turn to summer.

Sailing from Rosslare to Cherbourg on 3rd June, I am planning to pay my respects at Juno Beach in Normandy before going to the Western Front. More specifically, going to Flanders, to Broodseinde, where both my great grandfather and my grand uncle suffered gunshot wounds.

Only yesterday did I discover that Clem had been wounded in action.  GSW his record says, gunshot wound. Why hadn’t we ever been told he had been hit by gunfire?

Memories are clear of Uncle Clem. He had always seemed old, but perhaps anyone over forty years of age had seemed old to a primary school child.

Uncle Clem was seventy-five years old when he died in 1972, which I suppose was a good age to have reached five decades ago. It was a particularly good age to have reached for a man whom we were told had shrapnel in his lungs fom his time at the front.

Uncle Clem was only sent to the front because there was a shortage of men. He had joined up at the beginning of 1916. Being trained as a baker, he had been assigned to the Army Service Corps.

Whether it was Napoleon Bonaparte or Frederick the Great that said an army marches on its stomach, the fact is that without supplies, no army can function. From April 1916 until July 1917, he remained with the Army Service Corps. Then in the summer of 1917, he was transferred to the Royal Fusiliers, to the Second Battalion (City of London Regiment). His records say that there was an adjustment in his pay to ensure he was not out of pocket in being sent to the front (presumably bakers were paid more than men at the front).

The disastrous Battle of Passchendaele was drawing to a close when Uncle Clem was hit by gunfire on 30th October 1917.

No-one ever talked about his war service. No-one ever spoke about what had happened on the Western Front for him to carry injuries that affected him for the rest of his life. Perhaps there were so many war wounded, anyway; perhaps the memories of the Second World War were still so raw that no-one wanted to talk about the Great War that had preceded it.

Yet until yesterday, I believed he had been hit by shrapnel from an artillery barrage. Perhaps it was an easier tale to tell, an impersonal random, shell falling on a trench demanded no further explanation. A gunshot wound to the right hand side of the chest would have been a more personal recollection which he perhaps preferred to forget.

The wounds took him back to Le Treport and then to a posting with the Labour Corps. Returning to life in Pitney in 1919 must have seemed like paradise after Passchendaele.

Reading the records, it is odd to think that the gentle and quiet man who would sit at Aunt Ella’s tea table and chat and laugh with a small boy had once seen a place that was hell on Earth.

Posted in Out and about | Leave a comment