An untold tale

My sisters have a network of roads they use altogether different from those that I follow. Were we making the journey from Taunton to our home village of High Ham, there seem points where our routes might intersect, but few lengths of road which we all three would travel. So it was that returning from Musgrove Park Hospital in Taunton, where we had taken my mother for an outpatients consultant appointment, my sister, who was driving the car, unexpectedly turned off the main road and began a straight-line journey across the Levels towards Aller.

Anyone familiar with Sedgemoor will know that the droves across the Levels are roads for those who know them well. Sometimes there will be deep ditches either side of the single track roads; often passing places are infrequent. My sister drives with the sangfroid of a taxi driver, unlike me, has no need to silently concentrate on the road ahead, and absorbs every detail of the landscape.

Aller is one of the villages we would call home. The cluster of parishes, Langport, Huish Episcopi, High Ham and Aller, was home to generations of our forebears. There were many stories my sister might have recalled, but never before had I heard the one that was discussed.

“Mum, isn’t this the lane that Grandad cycled to fetch the nurse the day that you were born”

It was the lane. Our grandparents were living in a council house in Aller. But why? How did they come to be there? Why weren’t they on the home farm at Pibsbury?

In my version of family history, my great grandparents were living in the farmhouse, and Uncle Stan, their oldest and unmarried son was living with them. Next door, in the farm cottage, lived my grandparents, with my eldest aunt and then my mother (there would be seven children, eventually). By the time of the 1939 register, drawn up at the beginning of the Second World War, they are all resident at the farm, what had brought my grandparents to live a good three miles distant?

Of course, I could have asked. Instead, in my mind’s eye, I saw a young man of twenty-three pedalling a battered black bicycle out from Aller. Flat-capped, with collarless shirt and corduroy trousers, he wore an old jacket and heavy workman’s boots. These were the days before the National Health Service. Would he have had to calculate how many shillings it would cost for a nurse to attend a birth?

Whatever the cost, he would have enjoyed the day. It was 1st May 1937, war was still a remote thought. The moor would have been alive with springtime and a baby daughter would be born.

 

Posted in Unreliable memories | Leave a comment

The men from the ministry

It must have been on a Sunday afternoon that The Men from the Ministry was broadcast on the BBC Light Programme. It is hard to imagine my grandparents would have sat in their front room listening to the wireless at any other time. In memory, programmes like The Clitheroe Kid and The Navy Lark shared a similar Sunday afternoon airing, but that might be simply a conflation of childhood impression.

The Men from the Ministry abides because, on a small Somerset farm, “the ministry” meant only one thing, the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.

The Ministry was regarded with fear and resentment, its inspectors were seen as inquisitive and critical. The years of the Second World War had seen the emergence of an organisation that dominated farming, that directed policy and micromanaged its implementation. The men from the ministry might arrive in the farmyard at any moment, checking on all that was happening, asking to see livestock, production records, paperwork.

In wartime, the interference was accepted. After the war, my grandfather felt that the government should have stood back and left farming to the farmers. He believed much of the government’s intervention had been counterproductive, that its attempts to direct production were inefficient, that subsidies were a mistaken policy.

Men from the ministry seemed still to be arriving at the farm for various reasons when I was a child in the 1960s, although I suspect “the ministry” was a term used to cover anyone who worked for any government body.

Perhaps it was a feeling toward the men from the ministry that nurtured a suspicion of all authority.

Authorities seemed to do little to assist the small man. If you were a big farmer or a big businessman, you always had the influence that was necessary to ensure that policies were interpreted by officials in a way that was advantageous to you. If you were a small farmer or a small businessman, then policies and the regulations they brought, were rarely to your advantage. Even record-keeping and paperwork were much easier on a farm where the farmer had workmen to continue his tasks, while he dealt with the forms, than they were on a farm where the farmer had to do everything himself.

Perhaps laughing at The Men from the Ministry on a Sunday afternoon, laughing at pomposity and incompetence and bureaucracy, was a small act of rebellion against the sort of official who might step into the yard on a Monday morning.

 

Posted in Unreliable memories | Leave a comment

Theoretical gardening

There is no more cheering sight in springtime than the racks filled with packets of garden seeds that appear in shops. The seedsmen know the value of colour and the seed packets are a bright display amongst much that is mundane in hardware shops. Vegetable pictures are as attractive as those of flowers. Packets for artichokes are as striking as those for azaleas, those for zucchini as pleasing as the packets for zinnia.

When I was a child, the seed packets represented happy times. Dad would plant the back garden with various vegetable seeds. Rows were planned using baler twine tied between two sticks. The drill was dug along the line of the twine and the seeds were sown. Rows would be marked with sticks pushed into the ground at either end. The empty seed packet would be pushed down onto one of the sticks as a reminder what plants had been sown in each row. The colour of the packets would fade in rain and sunshine and the weather would eventually carry them away, but they would endure long enough for the seeds to become established and for the plants that were growing to become recognizable.

After an afternoon in the garden, there always seemed to be a delightful moment of standing back and looking at the day’s work, marked, as it was, by the brightness of the seed packets.

Since those days, gardening has seemed an attractive pastime, in theory.  Apart from mowing the grass in times of necessity, gardening has never been a regular activity. Perhaps the two summers spent cutting iris rhizomes at Kelway’s Nurseries in Langport were sufficient to put me off of gardening; perhaps I have an innate aversion to anything demanding regular effort.

Theoretical gardening reached its height in the closing weeks of 1998. Preparing to move to Dublin at the beginning of 1999, I decided I was going to revive the neglected vegetable patch at the back of the house in Dublin. I bought books on vegetable gardening and pored over them (as I did with the book of elementary Irish that I had bought my children).

The attempts at the practical growing of vegetables lasted slightly longer than the attempts at getting my tongue around basic words in Irish, maybe a couple of springs, but neither lasted very long. With the building of a new rectory in 2006, the ground of the vegetable patch disappeared, so there was no feeling that the enterprise should ever be attempted again.

It is almost twenty years since I attempted practical gardening, it is a much easier activity when approached theoretically.

Posted in The stuff of daily life | Leave a comment

Living close to the law

It was suggested to me that a “cider house” was a sort of bar or cafe. If it was, it was a meaning very different from the meaning of “cider house” in our family.

The maternal grandparents of a first cousin once removed lived at the end of Windmill Road in High Ham.  Uncle Jack Cox had kept a cider house in the barn that adjoined his home (I assume he was called by his full name to distinguish him from the other Uncle Jacks in the family).

Cider houses were unlicensed drinking places, they were rough buildings in which friends and neighbours would gather for conversation and drink.  Perhaps they only lasted as long as the cider lasted, perhaps they were more permanent. They had a legal status comparable with that of a síbín in Ireland.

The cider house did not meet with the approval of Aunt Florrie, Uncle Jack Cox’s wife, who, wanting to be rid of the illicit drinkers one evening, drew a bucket of water, stepped into the cider house, and threw the cold water over those assembled – including the local police constable who had stepped in for refreshment.

The story is retold with amusement, but also as a reflection of attitudes to the law.  The law was always there for guidance, rather than something to be observed to the letter.

There was a history of minor infringements: vehicles without proper lights, tax discs being out of date, mechanical deficiencies. There might also have been the odd contravention of public order rules.

I remember having my first pint of beer in a pub when I was fourteen. I used to drink a concoction of lager with a shot of blackcurrant juice. By the time I had reached legal drinking age, I drank real ale.

At no time would anyone in our community have regarded a teenager having a pint with his Dad as a breach of the law, nor would they have seen after hours drinking, buying untaxed cider, or minor traffic infringements as illegal activity.

There was law and there was common sense, and we believed in living by common sense.

It is presumably to such “common sense” that the Prime Minister appealed when talking about the response to which Covid-19 for which he had hoped. The aspiration seemed to be for a middle way between a legalism that would make life miserable and an irresponsibility that would show no regard for anyone. What the Prime Minister might have suggested was “cider house rules,” acknowledging that people would make their own choices, but insisting they would be sensible in what they did.

 

Posted in The stuff of daily life | Leave a comment

Seeing through the eyes of a boy

Sitting in the garden, eating pasta and salad for lunch, I glanced up at an upstairs window.

The window had been the vantage point for a boy who spent much of his time hiding in his room. The room was small, but became a point from which to survey the world.

The levels to the north of the village would be covered in mists in the winter time and it would be possible to imagine the land as it once was, covered by water that stretched to the Bristol Channel. Tradition said that Joseph of Arimathea had once sailed through those waters, bringing with him a young Jesus of Nazareth. Tradition in the village said that Joseph and Jesus had landed at Turn Hill, the sheer hillside to the west of the village, and had walked the land that the boy walked.

Joseph of Arimathea was more famous, but not nearly as exciting for a boy as the tales of King Arthur. Glastonbury Tor, visible across the moorland, was not just a place visited by Jesus of Nazareth, it was the isle of Avalon. Arthur and his knights had ridden through this landscape; battles against enemies, both mortal and magical, had been fought. Best of all, Merlin the wizard had exercised his powers here. There were stories of men who said they had met with Merlin, though the tales may have owed more to cider than to any encounter with the supernatural. There was sadness in reading the account of the death of Arthur, but reassurance in the thought that he and his knights only slumbered and would one day again ride forth through these lowlands.

Standing at that upstairs window and staring across at Glastonbury Tor, a whole world of imagination was possible. Rising sharp from the moorland, its place as a source for legends and stories was easy to understand.

Conversations about those who frequented Glastonbury in the 1960s were as captivating as traditions about those who had been there in ancient times. The hippies offered colour and excitement; their vivid clothes and abundant hair contrasted sharply with the conventionality of rural England. Local adults frowned upon their activities, whispering about the things that were said to go on, but the adult disapproval only made these exotic newcomers more fascinating. It would have been impossible to imagine that fifty years later, they would still be in Glastonbury.

Fifty years later, and I wondered, if I stood at the window and stared across the levels, I would see the things that the boy had seen. The trees are taller, but the Tor is still visible. Are there still children who imagine Joseph and Arthur? Does anyone still look at the mists and imagine the sea? Do people still meet Merlin?

Posted in Unreliable memories | Leave a comment