Remembering a soldier

‘Who is that?’ asked a cousin last week.

‘That’s our great grandfather, Albert Luxton. His uniform was from when he was in the military police after the First World War.’

Born in 1880, he was the youngest among his siblings to serve in the 15th Hussars. Along with Albert, there were older brothers William, Henry and Richard, each enlisting with the Corps of Hussars, each being assigned to the 15th Hussars, each being assigned to other units later in their career.

Military service seemed to have come with severe hardships.

Richard was deemed unfit for military service at the beginning of 1900, but was called back to the colours that summer and was despatched to South Africa to join the battle against the Boers. His health did not improve in the decade that followed and he died at the age of 42 in 1914.

Born in 1869, Henry was three years senior to Richard, and perhaps set the pattern for his younger brothers, enlisting at the age of eighteen. Henry completed the twelve years for which he enlisted and was transferred to the army reserve. Back at home in Aller, his wife died just before the First World War, and Henry returned to army life at the age of forty-five. Great great grandmother Luxton became the guardian of his children, a woman whose reputation for severity has been passed down through the generations. Henry’s attestation has ‘United Kingdom service only’, written across the top. He served as squadron sergeant major in a number of military depots. It was 1920, when he was fifty-one, before Henry returned to civilian life.

The answer to why the four brothers joined the army, facing hardship and risking death, was not hard to find. The occupations listed on the papers are manual work, one is a gardener, the others are labourers. Work was scarce, pay was poor, army life was a better option than remaining in Aller in the hope of improvement.

On returning from the Western Front in 1919, Albert found himself facing the situation common to hundreds of thousands of other soldiers who were being demobbed.  He had been a soldier for twenty years and had no other trade. He rejoined the army and was sent to Ireland where the War of Independence had begun.

For years there was a fear in the family that he had served with the Black and Tans. Only in recent months did I discover that he had served with the Military Provost Staff Corps. He had the unenviable task of trying to police soldiers, many of whom, like himself, were still in uniform because they could find no other work.

One of the recollections of him among older family members was of him having a serious drink problem in latter years. Such a comment prompted a sharp response on my part. ‘Can you imagine serving as a cavalryman throughout the Great War and you come home and no-one wants you? Would you not have started to drink? Can you imagine the PTSD he must have suffered?’

 

 

Posted in This sceptred isle | Leave a comment

The things that last

A suggested video on a social media site was of a yellow-fronted diesel locomotive approaching a railway station.  The briefest of searches would have produced thousands of such images from lines the length and breadth of Britain.

Is there any nation in the world quite as fascinated by railways? Much of the fascination is not with railways that operate Twenty-First Century rolling stock as part of the national rail network, but with railways which were closed more than fifty years ago. These are the lines where volunteers run trains on lengths of track which may sometimes be miles from the nearest line of the network. Stations which may have been used by a handful of passengers in British Rail days may now attract hundreds of visitors at weekends and holidays.

It has been noticeable that diesel locomotives now feature more and more among the engines. Diesels were once despised by steam railway enthusiasts, they are the villains in the Thomas the Tank Engine series of books by the Rev. W. Awdry. Perhaps it is a practical decision, the boilers of steam locomotives require regular inspection and expensive maintenance; perhaps it is an economic necessity, railways run on a shoestring are able to more readily run diesel engines.

The appearance of diesel engines on steam railway lines suggests that nostalgia is flexible, that something that was once cold-shouldered could become something that was much loved.

If blue and yellow former British Rail diesel locomotives are evocative of the past for people in 2025, then what things are there in 2025 that will become objects of nostalgia in fifty years’ time? In 2075, what will people preserve and restore as symbols of the past?

Perhaps there will still be railways, perhaps the sleek dark green locomotives of the present Great Western Railway will have found homes for retirement on preserved lines where the use of a carbon fuel will still be tolerated. But what else will there be?

Visit antiques centres, and much of the stock is the everyday miscellany of former times. Growing up on a farm where my grandfather milked a herd of twenty cows, the churns and the buckets were so commonplace as to be unworthy of comment, yet such items are now to be found on sale as antiques. Kitchenware, furnishings, clothing, garden tools, machinery – there seem to be few things that will not find a buyer. Even tins for biscuits, sweets and cleaning compounds will now be found for sale.

If the everyday of fifty years ago has become the nostalgia of today, then how much of today’s everyday will appear in antiques shops? Will there be air fryers, microwave ovens, coffee machines, Dyson vacuum cleaners, desktop computers and iPhones and countless other consumable durables from 2025? What that we have will be worthy of nostalgia?

Posted in This sceptred isle | 2 Comments

Unexpected intelligence

Perhaps it was the discovery that bees could count up to four that made me think about intelligence in the natural world. A friend still doubts the studies of Queen Mary University, London that shows the mathematical ability of bees, but it was a beekeeper who explained the dance that the scouts do to indicate the distance to the nectar.

Given such a capacity among bees, it should not have come as a surprise that dogs seem considerably more intelligent than I had imagined.

The long secondary school summer holidays in Ireland (June, July and August), meant being able to spend eleven weeks in Somerset, during which time the Arthurian dogs in the house, Guinevere and Galahad became accustomed to a routine.

A Maltese and a Chihuahua, they are dogs that love company and comfort, and they love carers who can tell the time as well as them.

Lunch is at midday and dinner is at five o’clock. A delay of more than a few minutes will prompt a barked reminder that their meal is due.

In the summer, the dogs decided that a third snack was in order, that a small snack would be welcome at around 8.30 each evening. In the middle of an ITV 3 episode of Vera or Midsomer Murders, Guinevere would assume the role of messenger and appear in the room. The request was made with a brief bark or pawing of my leg. Once the chew was given, they would run off contentedly.

The Halloween mid-term break brought a return to Somerset on the Saturday, and at around 8.30 pm, I was sat chatting with my son who had come on the trip. There came the sound of dogs’ paws running across the tiles of the kitchen floor. The dogs appeared and there was the customary bark.

It had been nine weeks since I had last been in the house. How on my first evening back, did the dogs remember not only the treats but also the time at which they might hope to receive a chew?

Perhaps the daily routine of lunch and dinner are more memorable, like humans perhaps their stomachs tell them the approximate time?

But the treats? There had been no routine for more than two months, no-one keeping up the habit of the chews. How did they remember not just that I was a soft touch but that at 8.30 they could expect a response?

Posted in The stuff of daily life | 4 Comments

Not a sparrow falls

There was one of those Christmas quiz shows on television.  The quizmaster was Richard Osman, the man who used to be on Pointless but who then became a bestselling crime writer (a case of verification of the Biblical maxim, to he who has shall be given, like Cillian Murphy having a music programme on BBC Radio 6).

The contestants were being asked for numbers to answer arbitrary questions.  One question was on how many beefeaters there had been in the Tower of London.  Given that the tradition has existed for five and half centuries any number given might have been credible.

There was one answer that seemed unlikely, the question was how many breeding pairs of robins are there in Britain.  The answers were given in tens and hundreds of thousands.  The actual answer was 7,350,000. It seemed a very unlikely figure. ‘Second only to the wren’, said Mr Osman. That seemed even more unlikely.

The numbers seemed so large that Google was called upon for verification.  Sure enough, the number of breeding pairs of robins was cited as 7.4 millions.  That gives a total population of 14.8 millions.  The figure for the pairs of wrens was a million more, which means there are nearly 17 million wrens in Britain.

Where are they?

Robins still seem such notable visitors that some people suggest they are the soul of a departed loved one (a tradition that I only discovered in conversation with First Year students during the past year.

Fourteen million seems such a large number that it seems almost odd that robins still occasion comment.

And the wrens?

Like the robins, the appearance of a ‘jenny wren’ was something to prompt comment.

Perhaps it is just in our corner of England that the largest bird populations are not as obvious as their figures would suggest.  Even so, the combined total is more than thirty millions and I do not believe either species has been visible in the garden during the past week.

It was a surprise that the robins and the wrens outnumbered the sparrows, which seemed ever present in our garden.

Perhaps the notion that sparrows were a plurality arose from the Gospel teaching of Jesus on God’s concern for the small and insignificant, ‘not a sparrow shall fall.’ Maybe in First Century Palestine, the plurality lay with the sparrows.

‘Not a robin shall fall,’ would seem a much more graphic image, but would have lacked a feeling of the commonplace.  As numerous as they may be, the robins retain a special place.

Posted in Out and about | 2 Comments

Why Betjeman was wrong about Christmas presents

 . . . those tissued fripperies,
The sweet and silly Christmas things,
Bath salts and inexpensive scent
And hideous tie so kindly meant

John Betjeman’s poem Christmas, motivated by his desire to emphasise the religious, is dismissive of the gifts given to each other by ordinary people. The son of affluent parents, public school and Oxbridge educated, Betjeman does not hold in high regard those things that do not conform to his taste.

Was he justified, though, in using words like ‘fripperies’  and ‘silly’? Was he reasonable to trivialise other people’s choices because they did not match his understanding of Christmas?

Betjeman understood well the concept of the sacramental, the poem itself concludes with the belief that Jesus is present in bread and wine; the sacramental is about an outward sign carrying an inner meaning. For Betjeman, the bread and wine are the outward of the inner reality of Christ’s presence. But can the things aboit which he was so scathing not have a sacramental significance for those who gave them and for those who received them?

A poor print in a cheap plastic frame hangs on the room of the bedroom in which I sleep when I am in Somerset.  It was a gift to my mother in childhood years in the early-1970s. A seascape, it depicts the rock formation at Durdle Door in Dorset; print and frame together weigh no more than a few ounces.

The print has hung on the wall for at least fifty years, it is hard to remember it not being in the house. Why has it retained its place for so long when numerous other things, probably more valuable and certainly more tasteful, never gained a lasting place?

The print would have fallen into Betjeman’s category of ‘inexpensive’, though it probably consumed most of a small amount of pocket money. He would probably have thought it ‘hideous’, he would not have been a man impressed by cheap plastic things, but was it ‘silly’?

My mother clearly thought that the picture had a significance that extended far beyond what could be seen or touched, it was a sign, for her, of something deeper, something that could not have been described by the child that bought the print, thinking it a work of art.

Perhaps many Christmas presents are fripperies with no meaning beyond themselves, they are silly, but perhaps many more are outward signs of deep thoughts and feelings, they are sacramental. When it comes to surveying one’s presents on Boxing Day, the inner meaning shouldn’t be forgotten.

Posted in Unreliable memories | Leave a comment